Fiscal embeddedness: taxation policy as an institutional tool of state-building

Following Joseph Schumpeter’s assertion that “the public finance is one of the best starting points for an investigation of society, especially, though not exclusively, of its political life”, I find that the multidisciplinary study of the sources, practices and consequences of taxation can greatly illuminate fundamental dynamics of any institutional configuration. States of Obligation: Taxes and Citizenship in the Russian Empire and Early Soviet Republic by Yanni Kotsonis (New York University) excellently fulfills this intellectual mission.
Beginning in the 1860s, the Russian Empire replaced a poll tax system that originated with Peter the Great with a modern system of income and excise taxes. Russia began a transformation of state fiscal power that was also underway across Western Europe and North America. States of Obligation is the first sustained study of the Russian taxation system, its European and transatlantic context, and its essential continuities between the fiscal practices of the Russian Empire and the Soviet Union.
States of Obligation Taxes and Citizenship in the Russian Empire and Early Soviet RepubliUsing a wealth of materials from provincial and local archives across Russia, in this very interesing and award-winning book Yanni Kotsonis skillfully examines how taxation was simultaneously a revenue-raising and a vital state-building tool, a claim on the person and a way to produce a new kind of citizenship. During successive political, wartime, and revolutionary crises between 1855 and 1928, state fiscal power was used to forge social and financial unity and fairness and a direct relationship with individual Russians. New taxation policy has been a crucial nexus for creating national accounting and the modern citizen. However, state power eventually overwhelmed both the private sector economy and the fragile realm of personal privacy.

This well articulated and enlightening book constitutes a crucial intervention in imperial Russian and Soviet history, demonstrating unexpected continuities between the Russian Empire and Soviet Union, challenging received understandings of the late imperial state’s reliance on agricultural taxation, and recalibrating the place of fiscality and the role of fiscal experts in the economic, political, and social shifts of the early Soviet period.
States of Obligation is a superb study in economic history, an astute analysis of the modern state, a valuable contribution to fiscal sociology scholarship and a compelling empirical demonstration of the state-economy-society mutual embeddedness.

***
Join the Economic Sociology and Political Economy community through
Facebook / Twitter / LinkedIn / Google+ / Instagram / Reddit / Tumblr

Advertisements
This entry was posted in Books and tagged , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

One Response to Fiscal embeddedness: taxation policy as an institutional tool of state-building

  1. An interesting economic topics. The Romans were the first to organise a tax system to collect
    revenues for their own Emperor which was represented by a network of servants controlling the
    collected revenues. In Medieval times, the great landholders in continental Europe and Britain,
    were called feudal barons, owners of the lands, and exploiting the labour – peasantry (called serbs of the gleba), these Barons were the main collector of taxes and part of their treasure was sent to
    the King. With the French Revolution and the abolition of the feudal system and with the creation of the State and its institution, the tax system, was imposed via Parliament to the citizens. Since then,
    always taxes have been part of important historical facts, producing revolutions and political crisis.
    i.e. The American revolution started because of a tax imposition to American exports of tea, the
    liberalism in the 19th century, based its principles in the free trade, specially Britain was one of the
    main supporters under its maritime ultramar sea trade, creating reaction in countries i.e. US in mid 19th century, opposed to British trade liberalism to protect their own emergent industries in the
    Atlantic coast. Another example was the Chilean Liberator Bernardo O’Higgins who in his government (1817-1823), imposed an extra taxation to the local landholders to finance the Independence campaign in Peru ( important and strategic territorial colonial possession of the
    Spanish Monarchi), etc.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s