The Goose and the Common — The Privatization of Public Space

“The [following 18th century folk] poem is one of the pithiest condemnations of the English enclosure movement, the process of fencing off common land and turning it into private property. In a few lines, the poem manages to criticize double standards, expose the artificial and controversial nature of property rights… And it does this all with humor, without jargon, and in rhyming couplets… Like most of the criticisms of the enclosure movement, the poem depicts a world of rapacious, state-aided “privatization,” a conversion into private property of something that had formerly been common property or, perhaps, had been outside of the property system altogether.” (Boyle 2003: 33-4).

The Goose and the Common / Anonymous

leavening_enclosure_mapThe law locks up the man or woman
Who steals the goose off the common
But leaves the greater villain loose
Who steals the common from the goose.

The law demands that we atone
When we take things we do not own
But leaves the lords and ladies fine
Who takes things that are yours and mine.

The poor and wretched don’t escape
If they conspire the law to break;
This must be so but they endure
Those who conspire to make the law.

The law locks up the man or woman
Who steals the goose from off the common
And geese will still a common lack
Till they go and steal it back.  

Boyle, James. 2003. “The Second Enclosure Movement and the Construction of the Public Domain“. Law and Contemporary Problems 66: 33-74.

***
Join Economic Sociology and Political Economy community via
Facebook / Twitter / LinkedIn / Google+ / Instagram / Tumblr

Advertisements
This entry was posted in Art, Papers and tagged , , . Bookmark the permalink.

3 Responses to The Goose and the Common — The Privatization of Public Space

  1. So what is the answer to this state of affairs? What kind of causal loop would need to be created to put right any problems the enclosure acts/private property causes? The concept of private property is deeply embedded in UK culture and politics, i.e. “An Englishman’s home is his castle”; a “home-owning democracy” . Perhaps what is needed is a fair income distribution so that everyone can privately own their own home. The concept is so deeply embedded in my own psyche that living in a Social Housing Association house amongst privately owned houses still creates a sense of superiority amongst some homeowners and resentment in some members of the families of house renters, including my own! Not owning a freehold property of my own gives me a feeling of insecurity.
    Apparently, in France and Germany, renting a home is the norm but I have not researched this, so I don’t know.

  2. ndarecca says:

    The same process was basically replicated when the British colonized North America, taking the Indians’ commonly held land for private property for settlers. Actually, that was the process of colonization in Latin America, Africa & Asia as well. A more modern example would be divvying up the state property of the USSR into the hands of a few politically connected kleptocrats. The rich and powerful are so good at taking others’ stuff!

    I’m restarting a blog on economic inequality and poverty that I’d like to share to get your feedback and assistance. Yours is one of the few blogs I’m following and I’m open to suggestions for other resources. Keep up the good work.

    Nick

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s